Language, Power, and Ideology in Vice President Sara Duterte’s Impeachment Statement: A Critical Discourse Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the strategic role of language in constructing power, legitimacy, and political resistance through a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of Vice President Sara Zimmerman Duterte’s public statement following her 2025 impeachment. Situated within a highly polarized democratic context, the research investigates how discourse functions not merely as communication but as a mechanism for shaping public perception and negotiating political authority, contributing to SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. Anchored in Fairclough’s three-dimensional CDA framework, van Dijk’s socio-cognitive approach, and Framing Theory, the study provides a multi-layered analysis of linguistic and rhetorical patterns. The corpus comprises a publicly available live-streamed statement lasting 25 minutes and 50 seconds, which was fully transcribed and systematically coded using a thematic and functional coding procedure. Findings reveal that Duterte employs a strategic combination of hedging, repetition, code-switching, evaluative language, and intertextual references to manage risk, assert authority, and mobilize public support. These linguistic devices construct overlapping frames of legitimacy, resistance, and victimhood, positioning the impeachment as both a political challenge and a collective national concern. The analysis further demonstrates that her discourse reinforces ideological narratives aligned with public trust, moral authority, and political resilience while subtly delegitimizing opposing actors. By activating shared cognitive and cultural schemas, her statements shape audience interpretation and sustain political credibility amid institutional crisis. This study contributes to the growing body of research on political discourse in Southeast Asia by highlighting how language operates as a strategic resource in high-stakes political events. It also offers practical implications for discourse analysis, media literacy, and political communication, emphasizing the need for critical engagement with language in democratic processes.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2024 IJPLH, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved. For all open access content, the Creative Commons (CC) Attribution 4.0 International Public License terms apply.
How to Cite
References
Arugay, A., & Encinas-Franco, J. (Eds.). (2024). Games, Changes, and Fears: The Philippines from Duterte to Marcos Jr. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Asgarova, M. (2025). Everyday Code-Switching Practices: Identity, Pragmatic Functions, And Social Context: How Multilingual Speakers Use Code-Switching to Navigate Identity and Interaction. Linguiverse, 1(1), 15-30.
Bauer, B. (2024). The unraveling: reflections on politics without ethics and democracy in crisis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English (Vol. 462). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. routledge.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 10(1), 103-126.
Demir, M., & Barton, G. (2023). Islamist populism in Turkey and Indonesia: a comparative analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Elamin, M. O. I. (2024). Leadership dynamics in the modern era: A comparative study of transformative and controversial leaders. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 379-392.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. McQuail's reader in mass communication theory, 390, 397.
Eslit, E. (2025). The “Agong” Resonates: Paradoxical and Oxymoronic Legacy of Duterte’s Stewardship.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Genres in political discourse. JL Mey, concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, 293-298.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2023). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 11-22). Routledge.
Gal, S. (1989). Language and political economy. Annual Review of anthropology, 18, 345-367.
Grover, J. (2025). The Impeachment Process: Partisanship, Polarization, Partisan Press, and the Integrity of the Presidency (Doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State University).
Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In Framing public life (pp. 157-178). Routledge.
Khan, A. (2024). The Language of power: discourse analysis and the politics of representation. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 2(01), 22-31.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant. Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction/Chelsea Green.
Lim, T. C. (2020). “It’s not just talk”: ideas, discourse, and the prospects for transformational change in a homogenous nation-state. Asian Ethnicity, 21(3), 348-372.
Linao, J. (2025). Voices of the Public: A Qualitative Content Analysis on the Perception and Sentiments Toward the Impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte in the Philippines. Available at SSRN 5125820.
Metz, R. (2026). In the age of populist leaders: insights from ideational, strategic and discursive performative perspectives. International Journal of Public Leadership, 22(1), 34-49.
Meyer, J. M. (2024). Power and truth in science-related populism: rethinking the role of knowledge and expertise in climate politics. Political Studies, 72(3), 845-861.
Mullet, D. R. (2018). A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of advanced academics, 29(2), 116-142.
Nguyen, O. (2025). Bridging Political and Academic Discourse: A Pedagogical Framework for Teaching Textual Grammatical Metaphors. BRU ELT JOURNAL, 3(2), 124-142.
Parkin, D. (1984). Political language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 345-365.
Pham, T. Q. (2024). A synopsis of the three most influential approaches of critical discourse analysis. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(3), 172-181.
Poulsen, L. N. S. (2020). Loyalty in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 26(4), 1156-1177.
Ragragio, J. L. D. (2025). Performing Durable Politics: Comparing Mediated Populism in the Philippines. Javnost-The Public, 32(1), 76-91.
Raza, A., & Naz, F. (2025). The Influence of Political Rhetoric in Shaping National Identity: A Study of Nationalism in 20th Century Literature. Journal of Social Impact Studies, 3(2), 46-57.
Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. Contemporary critical discourse studies, 67, 96.
Rahman, M. M., Arefin, S., Uddin, M. J., Akanda, F., Alam, H. N., & Binte, M. (2026). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Editorials of the Three English Newspapers on Hasina‘s Fall Using Norman Fairclough‘s Framework. World, 16(3).
Socrates, M. C. A. P. (2016). Frame alignments between the press and political actors: the Corona impeachment trial. Philippine Political Science Journal, 37(1), 43-62.
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2025, July 25). House impeachment complaint vs VP Duterte barred by 1-year rule, due process or fairness applies during all stages of impeachment process. Supreme Court of the Philippines. https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-house impeachment-complaint-vs-vp-duterte-barred-by-1-year-rule-due-process-or-fairness applies-during-all-stages-of-impeachment-process/
Talamayan, F. (2025). Articulating populism in the Philippines: The rhetorical strategies of Joseph Estrada and Rodrigo Duterte. Asian Politics & Policy, 17(1), e70001.
Talbot, M. (Ed.). (2019). Language and power in the modern world. Edinburgh University Press.
Tamase, P. S. (2024). Emerging Issues in Philippine Impeachment and the Accountability Constitution. Phil. LJ, 98, 442.
Tan, D. A. L. (2024). Mocking the Powers That Be: The Case of Culture and Political Humor in Malaysia. In Communicating Political Humor in the Media: How Culture Influences Satire and Irony (pp. 223-239). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
The Manila Times. (2025, February 18). Fourth impeachment complaint filed vs. VP Sara Duterte over alleged misuse of funds and other high crimes. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/
Thompson, J. B. (2013). Political scandal: Power and visability in the media age. John Wiley & Sons.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach (pp. 62-86). na.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.
Villanueva, G. (2024). Multimodal autoethnographic sincerity. Communication Studies, 75(4), 517-534.
Viviani, L. (2025). The politics of manipulated resonance: personalised leadership in populism. International Journal of Public Leadership, 21(3), 189-202.
Waller, M., & Linklater, A. (Eds.). (2003). Political Loyalty and the Nation-state (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
Wodak, R. (2024). Critical discourse analysis/studies. In The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 31-44). Routledge.
Yergensen, B. (2024). Media Spectacle as Political Epistemology: The Real-Time Construction of Presidential Impeachment. New Explorations, 4(2).