Borrowability of Loanwords by Semantic Fields in Tanzanian Ethnic Community Languages: Case of Hehe Language

Main Article Content

Fahamu Kasavaga
Chrispina Alphonce
Damasi Mapuga

Abstract

While investigating loanwords offers useful insights for tracing linguistic and socio-political background of its speakers, information regarding changes they bring in the lexicon of the Tanzania Ethnic Community Language (henceforth ECLs) is scanty. This paper looks at the loanwords found in Hehe language, shedding light on the semantic fields that are susceptible to borrowing and reasons accounting for. Employing a qualitative approach, it bases on data that were collected using oral elicitation, text analysis and focus group discussion in Kiponzelo and Mibikimitali rural villages of Iringa in Southern Highlands of Tanzania. The findings indicated that the semantic fields of the Hehe lexicon have changed due to importation of 1152 loanwords from 11 languages; that is, four neighbouring ECLs (i.e. Bena, Kinga, Kimbu, and Gogo), Swahili, Hindi, Arabic, French, Portuguese, English, and Latin. These loanwords fall into 28 semantic fields. Clothing and grooming are fields whose terminologies are borrowed most while the fields of basic actions and colour are least susceptible to borrowing. It was shown that borrowing is a function of linguistic and non-linguistic reasons. The linguistic reason is based on the need to fill lexical and semantic gaps caused by differences in the cultures and levels of technology between the Hehe speakers and the communities speaking source languages. The non-linguistic factors are prestige and absence of policies and regulations in Tanzania that legalize the use of ECLs (including Hehe) in formal domains for more than three decades; that is, since 1960’s until 1990’s. As such, the study is clear that while words belonging to all semantic fields have a chance to be borrowed, borrowability of lexical items from certain semantic field might vary from language to language. The reason being cultural differences of the speakers, their geographical location, weather condition, level of technology, and the nature of the contact. 

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biographies

Chrispina Alphonce, University of Dodoma, Tanzania

Chrispina Alphonce is a senior lecturer in the department of Foreign Languages and Literature at the University of Dodoma. She obtained her PhD from The University of
Dodoma in 2016. Her research areas cover sociolinguistics,
General linguistics, Southern Cushitic linguistics,
Documentation and Description of Endangered Languages,
Anthropological Linguistics, Pragmatics, Ethno-Bio
Linguistics, Linguistic landscape, and Language Contact.

Damasi Mapuga, Local Government Training Institute, Dodoma, Tanzania

Damasi Mapuga is assistant lecturer at The local government training institute. He obtained his Masters Degree in Arts Linguistics at the University of Dar es salaam in 2015. His areas of research cover general linguistics, reflective teaching, and Communication skills.

How to Cite

Borrowability of Loanwords by Semantic Fields in Tanzanian Ethnic Community Languages: Case of Hehe Language: . (2026). International Journal of Philosophy, Linguistics, and Humanities, 2(1), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.70847/690088

References

Beckwith, C. (2007). Koguryo: The language of Japan's continental Relatives: An Introduction to the Historical - comparative study of the Japanese-Koguryoic languages. Leiden: Brill NV.

Blommaert, J. (2013). Ideology and Language in Tanzania, Tilburg Papers in culture and Studies (2nd ed.). Babylon: Tilburg.

Carling, G., Cronhamn, S., Farren, R., Aliyev, E., & Frid, J. (2019). The causality of Borrowing: Lexical Loans in Eurasia Languages. PLOS ONE, 14(10). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223588

Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Der Sijs, V. (2009). Loanwords in Dutch. In M. Haspelmath, & U. Tadmor, Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook (pp. 338-359). The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton.

Durkin, P. (2014). Borrowed words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxfprd: Oxford University Press.

Guthrie, M. (1967-71). Comparative Bantu. Fanbrough: Cregg International Publishers.

Haonga, E. D. (2013). Lahaja za Kihehe: Mtazamo wa kiisimu, unpublished MA Dissertation. Dar es Salaam.

Hennink, M. M. (2014). Focus Group Discussion: Understanding Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kasavaga, F., & Alphonce, C. (2023). Lexical Borrowing: the Influence of Loanwords on the semantics of Kihehe. Ghana journal of Linguistics, 12(3), 44-64. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gjl/article/view/264877

Madumulla, J. S. (1995). Proverbs and Sayings: Theory and Practice. Dar es Salaam: Institute of of Kiswahili Research.

Matiki, A. J. (2016). Patterns of Lexical Borrowing in Chichewa. LASU 4, 4.

Muzale, H. R., & Rugemalira, J. M. (2008). Research and Documentaion of the Languages of Tanzania. Language Documentation & Conservation, 2(1), 68-108.

Polishchuck, G. V., & Yorava, I. O. (2023). "Lexicographic Evidence of Germanic Elements in the Early 20th century English Vocabulary". Scientific and Practical Conference (International Forum: Problems and Scientific Solutions) (pp. 214 - 219). Riga: The Republic of Lavia. doi:htttp// doi.org/10.305225 / 978 - 9934 - 26-227-2-53

Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en espanol: toward a topology of codeswitching. Linguistics, 18, 581-618.

Tadmor, U. (2009). Loanwords in the World's Languages. In M. Haspelmath, & U. Tadmor, Loanwords in the World Languages. A Comparative Handbook (pp. 55-75). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Walsh, M. T. (2004). Variability and Compounding of Affixes in Hehe Animal Names (Tanzania) . Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu on

Winford, D. (2013). The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.